Key findings:

• • • The market remains strong, but growth is difficult 鈥� Australian law firms are still posting solid demand and rate growth in the first half of FY 2026, yet the pace is becoming more challenging to sustain.

    • Australia is no longer a single legal market, but three distinct ones 鈥� The report identifies three clearly differentiated law firm segments: Large firms leading demand growth through aggressive investment; Big 8 firms emphasizing pricing power and cost discipline; and Midsize firms pursuing steadier, more moderate growth.

    • Early signals suggest GenAI is reshaping productivity and leverage 鈥� Changes in hours worked across seniority levels point to possible early impacts of GenAI; and while overall productivity is stable, non鈥慹quity partners and associates are logging fewer hours, while senior associates and equity partners are working more.

The Australian legal market enters the back half of FY 2026 with strong topline numbers, but beneath the surface, the market is working harder to maintain its momentum. Firms are navigating slower rate growth, shifting demand patterns, and the early tremors of what may prove to be a generative AI-driven transformation.

Solid footing, harder-won gains

Australian law firms built an impressive track record over the post-pandemic era, and the first half of FY 2026 shows that run may not be over yet 鈥� although its character is changing. Demand growth of 4.8% year-to-date sits a full percentage point above the average quarterly pace since FY 2022, according to the 成人VR视频 Institute’s just-released 2026 Australia: Midyear Legal Market Update report. Worked rates, meanwhile, rose 4.7%, which is respectable, but a noticeable step down from the 5.4% average growth firms had enjoyed since FY 2022.

At the practice level, the picture is broadly encouraging. Both transactional and counter-cyclical practice groups are accelerating, with workplace relations leading all practices at 9.9% year-to-date growth and corporate general close behind at 7.7%. However, a potential warning sign lies in the divergence among each macro-category’s flagship practice: insolvency & restructuring is surging at 7.9%, while mergers & acquisitions sits in contraction at -2.1%. If dealmaking remains subdued while restructuring activity accelerates, transactional practices could face meaningful headwinds in the quarters ahead.

Three markets, not one

Perhaps the most significant finding in this year’s report is what the market-wide averages have been concealing. Last year’s Australia State of the Legal Market report highlighted growing competition between the Big 8 and a broader group of Large law firms that were challenging the Big 8鈥檚 dominance. This year, a refined three-segment framework reveals that the former Large category was actually masking two very different stories, between Large firms and a newly identified set of Midsize firms.

The newly delineated Large firms have emerged as the clear demand leaders, posting nearly 7% year-to-date growth 鈥� roughly double their peers 鈥� fueled by aggressive investment and expansion. The Big 8, by contrast, are leaning into pricing power and cost discipline, growing demand at a more measured 2.7%. And the Midsize cohort, at 2.4% demand growth, is charting a balanced, moderate course.

The profitability divergence is even more striking. Since FY 2022, the firms now classified as Large have grown profits per lawyer by 27.4%, while Midsize firms managed just 3.1% 鈥� much closer to the Big 8’s 7.1% than to their former stablemates. What previously appeared to be a broad-based challenge to the elite was, in reality, concentrated among a smaller group of high performers that were pulling the average upward.

Early signals of AI-driven change

The report also surfaces a potentially significant development in law firm productivity. While overall hours worked per month ticked up slightly for the average qualified fee earner, the gains are unevenly distributed. Non-equity partners recorded their third consecutive productivity decline, and junior and mid-level associates are also slightly down. Yet senior associates and equity partners are logging more hours, keeping overall numbers stable. One possible explanation is GenAI 鈥� if firms are deploying these tools most heavily on research, drafting, and document review tasks that traditionally filled junior and mid-level associate hours, this is precisely the pattern we would expect to see. While it’s too early to draw solid conclusions, the distribution of hours may represent an early sign of how AI is beginning to reshape the traditional leverage model.

There is also a note of caution from firms鈥� clients. 成人VR视频 Market Insights data shows Australian general counsel growing more conservative in their spending outlook, with net spend anticipation for overall legal work dropping to 0 points. That means just as many GCs see their legal spend increasing as those that anticipating it decreasing.

Interestingly, international legal spend tells a different story 鈥� Australia-based GCs are increasingly looking outward, with the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions emerging as areas of particular activity, while Europe has cooled. For Australian firms with cross-border ambitions, the short-term opportunity may lie to the global east and south rather than west.

Looking into the second half of the year

As the Australian legal market moves into the second half of FY 2026, the story is no longer one of uniform prosperity but rather, one of strategic differentiation. Demand remains healthy, profitability is solid, and expense discipline is improving; however, growth is no longer evenly distributed. The law firms that thrive in the quarters ahead will be those that understand which game they’re playing. In an increasingly segmented market, adaptability 鈥� not scale alone 鈥� will define success.

You can download a full copy of the 成人VR视频 Institute’s 鈥�2026 Australia: Midyear Legal Market Update鈥� report by filling out the form below:

Key insights:

• • • Despite a strong 2025, law firms face growing challenges 鈥� Client expectations continue to evolve, as more clients are now more sophisticated around AI and pricing, pushing law firms to provide greater transparency and communication.

    • Client relationships are becoming shallower 鈥� As clients increasingly demand transparency and collaboration, particularly regarding AI adoption and pricing models, law firms must adapt quickly to meet these new expectations.

    • Differentiation is more vital than ever 鈥� Responsiveness, speed, and clear communication about value and technology have emerged as key factors for law firms to stand out and deepen client relationships.

AMELIA ISLAND, Fla. 鈥� It may have already become clich茅 to say that the legal industry is at a significant crossroads: Firms are coming off what appears by all measures to be a very successful 2025, yet the industry also is facing fundamental structural change, driven mainly by AI and subsequent changing client expectations.

Subsequently, that temperament permeated the opening sessions of the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 33rd Annual Chief Marketing & Business Development Officer Forum (formerly the Marketing Partner Forum) held this week.

鈥淣o matter how well we鈥檙e all doing, the angst level has never been higher,鈥� said one law firm leader at the Forum.

Jen Dezso, Director of Client Relations at the 成人VR视频 Institute, opened the event giving a data-rich thumbnail of the legal market, based mostly on the recently released 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market, published jointly by the 成人VR视频庐 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law. Dezso demonstrated that almost all key indicators for law firm performance are up 鈥� demand, fees worked, lawyer growth 鈥� and that firms seem to be 鈥渕onetizing the work they capture.鈥� The main drivers pushing firm growth, she explained, are being moved by strategic wins of high-value business rather than a higher volume of ordinary work.

鈥淣o matter how well we鈥檙e all doing, the angst level has never been higher.”

Yet there are some darker clouds on the horizon, she added, noting that client relationships may be a bit shallow. For example, while just over one-third of large clients (36%) said they plan to increase their legal spend in the coming year, less than one-quarter of that spend (23%) goes to the firm that the client uses most 鈥� a figure that has been dropping over the last several years. Indeed, that most-used firm now gets engaged for less than three work types, and only 15% of clients say they will use their most-used firm more in the coming year.

Not surprisingly then, these figures weighed heavily as panels of top lawyers and law firm marketing and business development specialists discussed these matters during the Forum.

鈥淐learly, the softening of client relationships is a key piece of this,鈥� said one business development officer. 鈥淎nd you can see that in RFPs and the level of transparency that clients are asking for. I think a lot of work needs to be done by law firms to ensure these deeper trusting relationships with clients.鈥�

Others on the panel agreed. 鈥淔inancially we鈥檙e doing very well, but we should be looking at what has changed with the clients,鈥� one said, adding that many outside law firms may not have fully processed the impact the global pandemic has had on client relationships over the ensuing five years.

What鈥檚 changed in clients鈥� minds?

Understanding and adapting to this change in clients鈥� mindsets should be mission critical for law firms today. Indeed, all other initiatives 鈥� collaboration, pricing, business development, and more 鈥� will flounder on the rocks if law firms don鈥檛 engage with their clients directly. And the primary result of that engagement should have law firms coming away with an understanding of what clients want and need and, even more importantly, where clients see their outside firms failing to meet those needs.

Though obviously a difficult conversation, this level of client engagement is the only way firms are going to be able to deliver for clients while remaining sustainable, innovative, and profitable themselves.

You can read the full here

Perhaps the most dramatic shift these panelists perceive is the change in client expectations around AI. Several noted that there is a growing disconnect between what clients believe AI should enable law firms to do and what firms are actually delivering 鈥� and many said this was the fault of poor communication. For example, RFPs now routinely include references to AI, with clients moving from a stance of caution 鈥� You can use AI, but not with my data 鈥� to one of collaboration 鈥� Where can we work together within the AI space? This rapid evolution requires firms to be able to communicate their clear roadmap for AI adoption and pricing innovation that is understood by partners and can be conveyed easily to clients.

鈥淭ransparency and communication are paramount,鈥� offered one law firm executive. 鈥淔irms must be able to explain their approach to AI and demonstrate its value to clients.鈥� In fact, several panelists suggested that the best opportunities to deepen client relationships often arise in these conversations around technology and innovation.

In many cases it is the role of the Chief Marketing and Business Development Officers to lead these conversations, especially as these talks can help differentiate the firm. 鈥淭he leaders in these roles may have the most important job within their firm,鈥� noted one panelist. 鈥淭he capability of these roles to see outside the walls of the firm is incredibly important.鈥�

Several panelists pointed out that increasingly in today鈥檚 crowded marketplace, differentiation is more vital than ever, yet seemingly more difficult to achieve. 鈥淪ometimes it does come down to responsiveness and speed 鈥� these age-old client service tenants that we鈥檝e all pursued forever,鈥� said another firm marketing professional.

In fact, according to 成人VR视频 Institute data, clients look at several areas of differentiation when considering outside legal services, including the firm鈥檚 AI implementation, with 40% of clients citing that. And while clients ranked both cost efficiency and the use of value-based pricing lower, at 29% and 16% respectively, many law firm leaders said they consider pricing a critical challenge for the industry, especially given the mounting pressure on the traditional billable hour model.

鈥淲e need to get clients to look at value, and we need to get our own partners to look at our own value proposition,鈥� explained one firm leader. 鈥淚f we can鈥檛 segment the work and see what it takes to deliver this, we are in trouble.鈥�

As the Forum discussions illustrated, as clients become much more sophisticated around pricing, law firms have to make sure their lawyers and partners can communicate the firm鈥檚 value to clients. 鈥淲e, as law firm leaders, need to have confidence in what are partners are saying 鈥� I mean, that鈥檚 true marketing 鈥� and we need to talk through these issues with partners, so everyone is more comfortable addressing this with clients.鈥�

You can find out more about next year’s Chief Marketing & Business Development Officer Forum 2027听here

Key insights:

• • • Pricing power now depends on clear, measurable value 鈥� Firms must prove their worth at every client touchpoint to justify charging premium rates.

    • Value delivery spans five critical stages 鈥� Demand management, service design, delivery excellence, value capture, and relationship management. All must be systematically audited and improved.

    • Action is essential 鈥� Diagnosing gaps is only the first step; law firms must assign accountability, set goals, and continuously adapt to meet evolving client expectations and avoid competing solely on price.

The 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market, published jointly by the 成人VR视频庐 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law,听shows that over the past three years, legal industry pricing has skyrocketed at an unprecedented pace.

Many law firms have enjoyed strong demand and the ability to command higher rates, often without significant pushbacks from clients. However, that era of unchecked growth is coming to an end. Today鈥檚 clients are far more discerning about what they are willing to pay for and why. More often, they scrutinize every invoice, questioning whether the value delivered truly matches the premium price charged.

The danger for many law firms is complacency. Past success can create a false sense of security, leading to assumptions that reputation alone will sustain pricing power. However, as client procurement teams become more sophisticated and alternative legal services providers enter the market, firms that fail to prove their worth will find themselves competing on cost, which can result in a race to the bottom that few can afford.

This shift signals a fundamental change in the market in which pricing power is no longer guaranteed by reputation or past performance. Instead, pricing power hinges on a firm鈥檚 ability to demonstrate clear, measurable value at every stage of the client relationship. Those firms that fail to adapt risk being forced into price-based competition, eroding margins and undermining long-term sustainability.

By 2025, even as inflation eased to a more typical 鈥� but still elevated 鈥� 3%, many law firms continued to push rate increases at more than twice that level. The disconnect between pricing and underlying economic conditions had widened into a significant gulf, underscoring the critical need for firms to clearly demonstrate and defend the value behind their premium rates.

So, how can firms ensure they are delivering premium value to earn the right to charge premium rates? The answer lies in systematically diagnosing where value is created 鈥� and where it is destroyed 鈥� across the entire client experience journey.

The 5 stages of legal service delivery

To maintain pricing power, firms must examine their service delivery through five key client experience stages. Each stage represents an opportunity to create value or destroy it.

1. Demand management

Do you truly understand the client鈥檚 business problem, or are you focused solely on the legal question? Effective demand management requires moving beyond transactional requests to uncover a client鈥檚 strategic objectives. This ensures the solutions proposed align with business impact, not just technical compliance.

You can hear more about the 鈥�2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market鈥� in听, on YouTube

Start every engagement by asking: What client business goal is driving this need?, What constraints is the client operating under?, and How will success be measured beyond legal compliance? These questions can reframe the conversation from a focus on deliverables to a focus on strategic results, positioning your law firm as a proactive partner in the client鈥檚 success.

By facilitating co-design workshops with clients and requiring clear documentation of business goals for each project, your firm ensures that every initiative is aligned with measurable impact. This approach not only demonstrates leadership and a deep understanding of client needs, but it also builds lasting trust and drives greater value throughout the relationship.

2. Service design

Are your offerings built around client outcomes or your own internal structure? Many firms design services based on practice groups and billing models, not on what may serve clients best. This can create friction and inefficiency.

Adopting a client-centric design philosophy requires mapping the client journey, identifying pain points, and designing integrated services around client business needs. For instance, bundling advisory and compliance work into outcome-oriented solutions and coordinating delivery through a single relationship manager simplifies decision-making, strengthens trust, and delivers consistent, measurable value throughout the engagement.

3. Delivery excellence

Do you have safeguards that prevent failures before they ever reach the client? Even the most sophisticated legal advice loses its impact if delivery is inconsistent or error prone. Breakdowns in market research, service design, process conformance, or communication don鈥檛 just create inefficiencies, they erode client trust and diminish the firm鈥檚 perceived value. This is about embedding reliability into your delivery model, so clients don鈥檛 have to chase updates, catch errors, or manage deadlines on your behalf.

Invest in quality checks and project management tools and use proactive risk controls 鈥攕uch as early warning systems for potential delays 鈥� that provide automatic status updates and clear ownership. These measures signal professionalism and reliability, reinforcing your premium positioning.

4. Value capture

Can clients clearly see and articulate the value you鈥檝e delivered? If your impact is invisible, your pricing will always feel inflated. Many firms struggle to articulate outcomes beyond hours billed, which can leave clients to wonder what they are paying for.

Communicate value in terms that matter to clients. Use outcome-based reporting to show how your work mitigated risk, accelerated timelines, or unlocked opportunities. Record these in quarterly impact reports 鈥� because when clients see tangible benefits, they are far more willing to pay premium rates.

5. Relationship management

Do you build trust systematically or hope it happens organically? Trust is the foundation of pricing power, but it doesn鈥檛 happen by accident. Firms that rely on personal rapport alone risk inconsistency and vulnerability when key contacts change.

Implement structured feedback loops, client listening programs, and regular value reviews. These mechanisms demonstrate commitment to continuous improvement and deepen client confidence in your firm鈥檚 ability to deliver.

Turning insights into action

Assessing your client鈥檚 journey is only the first step. The real challenge and opportunity lies in acting on those insights. Start by identifying gaps in the five key stages, then prioritize improvements that will have the greatest impact on client perception and outcomes.

Assign accountability for each stage, set measurable goals, and track progress over time. Consider creating cross-functional teams to break down silos and foster collaboration. Remember, value delivery is not a one-time project; it鈥檚 an ongoing discipline that requires vigilance and adaptability.

As the legal market transforms, so do client expectations. Firms that cling to outdated assumptions about pricing power will inevitably find themselves competing on cost alone 鈥� a losing strategy in an increasingly crowded and sophisticated marketplace.

You can download a full copy of the听2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market, published jointly by the 成人VR视频庐 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law, here

Key takeaways:

• • • Industry-wide AI investment brings risk 鈥� Law firms are navigating the effects of a broader, industry-wide surge in AI investment that has sparked speculation about a potential AI bubble, which suggests firms may need to reconsider aspects of their current strategic approach.

    • Strategic AI adoption leads to better returns 鈥� Firms that implement AI thoughtfully and strategically see greater, tangible returns, while those adopting AI superficially or mainly to justify higher billing rates could be more exposed if the bubble were to burst.

    • Long-term stability requires clear client value 鈥� Long-term stability hinges on making sure AI investments provide clear, measurable value and improved efficiency to clients, with transparency and client outcomes remaining central as law firms adapt to this period of heightened AI enthusiasm and uncertainty.

The newly released 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market, published jointly by the 成人VR视频庐 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law, shows law firms enjoying strong demand and record profits throughout the past year.

Indeed, for the average firm, this feels like a golden moment 鈥� clients are spending, rates are climbing, and AI investments promise a competitive edge. However, the report also illustrated how much of this growth is built on unstable ground. As firms race to adopt AI and advanced technology, they face new risks if they fail to use these tools wisely or don鈥檛 deliver clear value to clients. Success for many law firms now depends on rethinking business models, focusing on client needs, and ensuring technology investments create lasting stability.

This ramped-up competition has pressed law firms towards unprecedented growth in their spending on technology and knowledge management, with firms increasing their investments by nearly 11% and 10% in 2025, respectively 鈥� far outpacing inflation and 2024鈥檚 levels. This surge is driven by an arms race to adopt advanced AI solutions, particularly generative AI (GenAI), which promises to fundamentally transform how legal work is performed. Yet, the real winners may not be those firms that spend the most, but rather those that deploy AI strategically.

And, as past 成人VR视频 research showed, law firms with a clear AI strategy are to see tangible returns on investment. To understand why this optimism could be risky, let鈥檚 look at what鈥檚 fueling the AI frenzy.

AI hype in the legal sector

The legal industry in recent years has seen an explosion of interest and investment in AI. Industry enthusiasm , which has attracted an estimated $1.6 trillion in global investment since 2013, with $375 billion forecast for 2025 alone 鈥� a scale that鈥檚 surpassed historic projects like the Apollo space program. This enthusiasm stems from the belief that AI can significantly improve efficiency, as GenAI can draft documents, analyze contracts, synthesize summaries of complex topics, and even support legal decision-making.

Amid this surge in adoption and funding, concerns are mounting that the legal industry could be swept up in an AI bubble. If this bubble pops, investor sentiment sours, or funding gets curtailed, the average law firm could face a sharp slowdown in demand for premium services as client budgets tighten. Those firms heavily invested in AI without clear plan for return on investment (ROI) would be exposed to higher costs, lower utilization, and strong pressure to cut rates. These risks are amplified when AI is adopted superficially, such as using it merely to justify higher billing without improving outcomes.

Indeed, the issue becomes even more concerning when considering the magnitude of recent investments. From 2021 to 2025, law firms dramatically ramped up their technology investments, increasing their tech spending by an impressive 39.3% over those four years. This surge in spending is measured against firms鈥� technology spending levels in 2021 鈥� the year before GenAI became widely available. Knowledge management investments, closely tied to AI capabilities, followed a similar trajectory, with investment growth in that area surging 37.2% over the same period. These aren’t modest upgrades; rather, it鈥檚 a clear indication that firms are pouring resources into AI at an unprecedented rate.

If a sharp correction in the broader economy 鈥� like the AI bubble bursting 鈥� would occur, it would greatly strain client budgets, forcing organizations to cut costs and scrutinize their outside legal spending. As budgets tighten, clients will seek better value at lower price points, intensifying competition among firms and pushing outside lawyers to justify every dollar of their rates. Those firms that rely on premium pricing without delivering measurable efficiency gains will be the most exposed.

In fact, these vulnerabilities become clearer when we look at the numbers. Profit per lawyer rose by 8.4% above pre-2022 levels by the end of 2025, and fees worked per lawyer climbed an even greater 16.8%. However, most of that growth came from rate hikes, not necessarily operational improvements.

You can hear more about the “2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market” in , on YouTube

Some analysts argue that record-high rates could signal efficiency gains 鈥� if lawyers accomplish in one hour what previously took them 10, then the value delivered may justify the price. However, a $2,000-per-hour associate rate during a downturn could create sticker shock that could push clients toward lower-cost firms or in-house solutions. This dynamic underscores the risk of relying on pricing power instead of demonstrable value creation. In other words, today鈥檚 profitability hides a structural weakness: If client budgets tighten, those law firms leaning on rate increases rather than operational improvements will be the first to feel the pain.

Therefore, preparing for this scenario requires more than maintaining profitability. The real test of AI investment is whether it delivers measurable improvements for clients. Premium billing tied to AI adoption is sustainable only when clients clearly see added value. Firms that invest heavily in AI without translating those investments into efficiency and outcomes risk losing ground. The priority now for law firms should be to align their technology with client needs, demonstrate tangible benefits, and maintain transparency to preserve trust in an increasingly competitive market.

Assessing the payoff: AI value vs. AI bubble

By the end of 2025, law firms were allocating almost 40% more to their technology budgets than before the rise of GenAI. The ideal scenario for AI adoption would involve a brief, manageable dip in productivity as professionals adapt, followed by lasting efficiency gains. The reality, however, is more complex. Fees worked per lawyer have surged, even outpacing profit growth, driven largely by rate increases. Although higher rates can reflect efficiency gains when work is completed faster and with greater precision, they also create vulnerability if clients perceive them as a pure pricing move. Firms that fail to translate AI-derived gains into clear, measurable value may risk feeling strong pressure as client push back.

That brings us to a simple math equation that was underscored in the State of the US Legal Market Report: Will the practical returns 鈥� such as ROI 鈥� genuinely outpace the massive sums being funneled into AI investment?

This is ultimately a question of balancing costs and benefits, of course; but if the AI bubble bursts and prices soar, fast action will be required. And it will be those firms who guided their use of AI to generate greater value and thus higher profits that will come out ahead. In other words, if the value delivered by AI exceeds its cost, law firms are well positioned to weather even dramatic market shifts, making their AI strategies sound regardless of broader industry volatility.

You can download a full copy of the 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market, published jointly by the 成人VR视频庐 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law, here

Jump to 鈫�

2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market

As the data underpinning the just-released 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market 鈥� published jointly by the 成人VR视频 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law 鈥� makes clear, the industry is experiencing its own tectonic moment. Fundamental forces such as shifting client power, economic instability, and technological disruption are pushing some firms to extraordinary heights while leaving others on increasingly unstable ground.

This year’s report examines how the legal market’s current elevation came to be, why it may not last, and what firms can do now to prepare for the inevitable shift.

Key findings in the report

Some of the key findings discussed in this year鈥檚 report include:

• • • Unprecedented demand surge amid market redistribution 鈥� The US legal market experienced some of the strongest demand growth in more than a decade, driven in part by regulatory shifts and geoeconomic instability. Critically, smaller firms captured the lion’s share of growth as clients moved demand from the most expensive firms to lower-cost alternatives.
    • Intense expense growth 鈥� Technology spending and talent costs are rising rapidly, with firms aggressively investing in AI capabilities while simultaneously expanding headcount. This dual arms race is sustainable only so long as demand and rate growth can be maintained as well.
    • Structural business model conflict 鈥� The industry remains trapped between transformative technology and outdated billing structures. Despite heavy AI investments that will fundamentally alter how legal work is performed, 90% of legal dollars still flow through hourly billing arrangements that may no longer reflect the value delivered.
    • Deteriorating buyer sentiment 鈥� Many corporate general counsels (GCs) are signaling that they are considering significant spending pullbacks ahead, with Net Spend Anticipation dropping to levels not seen since the pandemic. Financial forecasts increasingly point to contraction by mid-2026.
    • Historical warning patterns 鈥� Today’s legal market dynamics (represented by booming demand amid instability, runaway expenses, and universal optimism) closely mirror the conditions that preceded previous industry downturns in 2007 and 2021.

As the report makes clear, the challenges ahead are significant. The same forces creating today’s peaks are simultaneously undermining the ground beneath them. The surge in demand stems not from economic health but from chaos 鈥� trade wars, regulatory upheaval, and geopolitical tensions 鈥� all while GCs face stagnant budgets and intensifying pressure to demonstrate value.

While much of this is outside firms’ control, however, their response to it is not. The report clearly shows that those firms that use the current boom to reinforce their footing by modernizing pricing models, strengthening client relationships, and deploying technology in ways that deliver measurable value rather than marketing gloss will be best positioned for what comes next.

As this year’s report illustrates, 2025 was less a summit than an inflection point. The firms that treat elevation as permanence may find, as countless mountain ranges have over geologic time, that height is not a promise 鈥� it’s a phase.

You can download

a full copy of “2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market,” published jointly by the 成人VR视频 Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law, by filling out the form below:

Key findings:

• • • Large firms are disrupting the traditional hierarchy 鈥� Large firms have outpaced the Big 8 in growth and profitability by scaling aggressively and capturing market share.
    • However, geoeconomic disruption has favored the Big 8 鈥� When global conditions shifted, Big 8 firms saw a significant increase in performance as Large firms began to faulter.
    • GenAI is reshaping legal operations 鈥� Australian firms are leading globally in adoption of AI, leveraging advanced tech to boost efficiency, training, and client service.

With the end of the 2024 Australian financial year (FY 2024) in June, the market concluded one of its most dynamic years, marked by fierce competition, strategic evolution, and technological disruption.

To examine these factors more deeply, the 成人VR视频 Institute has published its , a joint publication with Melbourne Law School, which offers a comprehensive view of the evolving landscape for the Australian legal market.

Jump to 鈫�

Australia State of the Legal Market 2025

The latest report reveals a market split between two dominant groups that are taking very different approaches to the racetrack. First, the prestigious Big 8 law firms, which have traditionally found success leaning on legacy and rate strength; and second, the rapidly rising Large law firms, which were beginning to outpace the pack by pursuing aggressive growth and scaling.

At the start of the most recent leg of this race (the beginning of FY 2024), Large firms seemed likely to continue their streak of aggressive growth in which they鈥檝e been outpacing the Big 8. However, in the last couple months of the past fiscal year, conditions changed in a way that may reshape the competition for the foreseeable future.

Strong performance amid challenges

Despite strong performance across the sector, the report highlights several challenges that firms must address. For example, talent management is becoming increasingly complex as firms expand and compete for skilled professionals, with direct expenses facing sharp acceleration. For years, Australian firms have been in an aggressive growth phase, pushing to capture a veritable cornucopia of legal demand. Now, as demand growth seems to be faltering, these firms are having to grapple with tough decisions regarding the growth they鈥檙e continuing to see in headcount and expenses.

Meanwhile, the rise of generative AI (GenAI) is shifting client expectations and challenging traditional pricing models, pushing firms to rethink how they deliver and value their legal service offerings. While GenAI may well have unlocked greater capacity for these firms to provide additional value per hour, it also poses challenges to the ways firms provide services and measure productivity. Australian firms have spent significantly to digitally transform their services, but a stress test for these innovations may well be around the corner.

Looking ahead, adaptability will be critical, the report shows. Australian law firms must use the momentum of a still profitable year to sharpen their operations 鈥� from technology integration to client engagement strategies. Those firms that embrace change and align their models with evolving client needs will be best positioned to thrive in a more volatile and fast-moving legal landscape. However, those that assume the strategies of the past will continue to serve them well may find themselves left behind. Indeed, Large firms have exemplified the value of adopting change and a growth mindset since the pandemic, yet the Big 8 are now suggesting that another turning point is already underway.

Ultimately, the future of Australia鈥檚 legal market won鈥檛 be decided by size or legacy alone. How this race ends will depend on how adaptable these firms are to the changing conditions on the track.

You can download

a full copy of the report, from the 成人VR视频 Institute and Melbourne Law School here

• • • Corporate GCs are focused on serving their businesses as strategic enablers and expect the same from their outside counsel

    • GCs increasingly demand advice that is proactive, clear, actionable, and aligned with broader business needs

    • Law firms that fail to meet these expectations risk being replaced by another law firm or an alternative provider

The legal landscape in the United Kingdom is experiencing a fundamental transformation, driven by economic uncertainty and rapid technological advancement. As corporate legal departments navigate these challenging waters, their expectations of outside counsel are evolving dramatically. Technical competence, while undoubtedly necessary, is no longer sufficient. Instead, UK general counsel (GCs) are increasingly expecting that their outside law firms evolve into true strategic business partners that can deliver measurable value beyond billable hours.

The shift from technical advisors to strategic enablers

Corporate in-house legal teams are increasingly focused on positioning themselves as trusted strategic advisors to their C-Suite; and in turn, they expect their external legal partners to support this same end, according to the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 State of the UK Legal Market 2025 report. Indeed, the conclusion is clear: solid technical advice is no longer enough for law firms to maintain a competitive advantage in the legal services market.

鈥淐orporate legal teams place more trust in firms with strong reputations and deep industry knowledge that can help them drive strategic discussions with their organization鈥檚 leaders,鈥� the report states, noting that this development represents a significant departure from the traditional model in which law firms were valued primarily for their legal expertise and ability to navigate complex regulatory frameworks.

However, today鈥檚 economic climate has intensified pressure on corporate legal departments to demonstrate clear value while controlling costs. According to the report, 28% of UK-based corporate legal departments are planning for their legal spend to decline in 2025. That represents an increase of 6 percentage points from the 22% that had anticipated a spending decrease in 2024. And UK GCs have proved that they know how to make these reductions happen, even as corporate matter volumes and law firm billing rates both increase. Clever GCs are becoming increasingly selective about how they allocate their external legal budgets, opting for lower-cost law firms or, in an increasing number of instances, alternative legal service providers (ALSPs).

This cost consciousness has fundamentally altered the value proposition that law firms need to offer in order to secure work matters. As one technology industry in-house counsel quoted in the report noted: 鈥淥ur job is to provide cost effective, valuable legal advice to our function teams in the next 12 months. The priority would be to find an efficient way of doing this.鈥�

Corporate GCs are no longer willing to pay premium fees for legal work that can be automated, streamlined, or just as easily performed in-house. Instead, they’re seeking legal partners that can help their in-house teams achieve their broader business objectives while delivering measurable efficiency gains.

The four pillars of modern legal partnership

In the report, UK GCs identified several key areas in which they expect their law firms to excel beyond traditional technical competence:

1. 1. 1. Business-aligned strategic thinking 鈥� Corporate legal teams want law firms that understand their industry, business model, and strategic objectives. This means providing guidance that goes beyond legal compliance to support business growth and competitive positioning. Law firms must demonstrate deep sector knowledge and offer insights that help drive strategic discussions at the boardroom level.
      2. Proactive communication and responsiveness 鈥� The report underscores that GCs 鈥渁ppreciate law firms that are proactive, communicative, and responsive.鈥� This expectation extends beyond mere availability to encompass anticipatory guidance and regular strategic check-ins that keep legal issues from becoming business problems.
      3. Clear, actionable advice 鈥� GCs emphasize the critical importance of 鈥渟implifying complex legal advice into clear, non-technical language, making it actionable for business leaders and stakeholders without legal backgrounds.鈥� Law firms that can translate legal complexity into business-focused recommendations position themselves as indispensable strategic partners.
      4. Value-added services 鈥� Beyond individual matters, corporate legal teams value outside firms that offer thought leadership content, training sessions, and informational resources that reinforce expertise while providing ongoing value to the organization.

Technology as a catalyst for change

Not surprisingly, the rise of AI and legal technology is accelerating the shift away from hourly billing model and toward outcome-based value delivery. GCs are optimistic about the potential impact of these changes with 41% of respondents expressing excitement about AI’s potential to free up time for complex and strategic work. At the same time, 18% of GCs also see technology as a means to handle increasing data volumes more effectively.

This technological transformation is forcing law firms to reconsider how they position their value to GCs. As routine tasks become automated, focus increasingly will shift toward strategic thinking, business judgment, and the ability to synthesize complex information into actionable business intelligence. And those law firms that fail to evolve beyond their role as technical service providers will risk losing market share to more strategically minded or even lower-cost competitors and ALSPs. In fact, the report notes that almost two-thirds (65%) of UK respondents said their corporate legal departments already work with firm-affiliated or independent ALSPs 鈥� a significantly higher portion than their counterparts in the United States, at 52%.

These shifts reflect a willingness on the part of GCs to unbundle traditional legal services, reserving high-value strategic matters for law firms but being more selective about which firms have demonstrated clear business value.

What GCs want

The report made clear that there are a few key criteria that GCs in the UK are looking for in their outside law firms, including:

• • • deep industry expertise and sector-specific knowledge;
    • investment in client relationship management that goes beyond individual matters;
    • value-added services such as training programs and thought leadership;
    • technology solutions that demonstrate efficiency and cost-effectiveness; and
    • restructured pricing models that better align with client outcomes rather than time spent.

The message from UK general counsel is clear: The legal market is moving beyond technical competence toward strategic partnership 鈥� and outside law firms that want to succeed need to make that move.

GCs have an increasing set of demands being placed upon them, and those law firms that recognize this shift and actively work to become trusted business advisors will have greater opportunity to thrive in this new environment. Those that cling to traditional models of legal service delivery, however, risk being relegated to commodity status or replaced entirely by more agile alternatives.

You can download a copy of the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 State of the UK Legal Market 2025 report here

Key takeaways:

• • • AI allows lawyers to work on more complex matters 鈥� By streamlining routine legal tasks, AI enables lawyers to focus on higher-value work, which then revives market interest in outcome-based pricing models.

    • Establishing trust with AI is critical 鈥� Building client trust with AI means providing clear explanations, maintaining open communication, and ensuring that human judgment remains central to the legal process.

    • Keeping an eye on AI鈥檚 work quality 鈥� Declines in quality from AI-assisted work can make clients question the value of legal services.

As AI becomes part of everyday legal work, the traditional way of charging clients by the hour may be long past its expiration date. And as the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 2025 State of the US Legal Market Report argues, this change isn鈥檛 just about using new tools 鈥� it鈥檚 about redefining how legal value is delivered.

A new opportunity to bill based on value

For many years, the billable hour has held sway in the legal industry; and while this method is familiar, it is falling behind how legal work is increasingly being performed today. AI now supports tasks like document review, legal research, and drafting, reducing the time lawyers spend on routine work and creating more opportunities for higher-value work.

As a result, a seemingly stagnated theory of pricing is once again gaining ground 鈥� one that focuses on outcomes instead of hours. In this model, clients pay for what gets accomplished: resolving a dispute, drafting a contract, or ensuring compliance with regulations.

This approach ultimately strengthens the relationship between firms and clients. It rewards results, encourages clear communication, and makes pricing more predictable and fair. However, this shift also brings new challenges for law firms and their clients, especially around trust and quality.

Building client trust using AI tools

Clearly, clients benefit from faster and more cost-effective legal services; however, they also need to trust that the work they receive from outside counsel is accurate and meets professional standards, even 鈥� or perhaps especially 鈥� when AI is involved.

To build that trust, AI systems must be used responsibly. Lawyers using AI should be able to provide clear explanations of how they reached conclusions, keep records of their steps, and always involve a human review and approval of the final work. Clients don鈥檛 need to understand every intricacy of the technology of course, but they do need to know that the process is safe, ethical, and well-managed.

Many law firms are already using AI tools in their daily work. While these tools can improve efficiency, it鈥檚 important to not assume that clients will always be comfortable with them. One way to monitor this is by looking at the realization rate in fees, especially the difference between what the client actually agreed to and what was actually collected. This metric can show to what degree clients may be pushing back on service they feel didn鈥檛 meet expectations.

Over the past three years, realization rates have remained steady, just above 90% 鈥� however, that doesn鈥檛 mean there鈥檚 no risk. If AI is used carelessly, the quality of work could suffer, and clients may start to question their bill. That鈥檚 why it鈥檚 essential to use AI with clear processes and human oversight, so it supports the value that clients expect rather than creating problems for the firm and the client.

Declines in quality can lead to doubts about value

As AI becomes more commonplace in legal processes, the quality and reliability of submissions must remain high. This matters not only for the fairness of proceedings, but also for how legal services are valued.

If AI-generated documents are submitted without proper review or contain errors, it can lead to delays, rejections, or even sanctions. These outcomes affect the perceived value of legal services and can undermine client trust, especially in an outcome-based pricing model, where results matter more than effort.

To support this shift in pricing, legal professionals must ensure that AI-assisted work meets the same standards as their traditional submissions. This includes verifying sources, disclosing AI use when appropriate, and maintaining human oversight. By doing so, law firms protect the quality of their work and reinforce the value they had promised to deliver.

According to the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 2025 survey of state courts, many in the legal profession already are thinking about these issues. The top concern 鈥� shared by 35% of judges and court staff professionals who were surveyed 鈥� is that people may rely too much on technology and lose essential skills. Another 25% said they worry about AI being misused, such as by generating fake legal documents or false evidence.

These concerns highlight the need for clear standards and responsible AI use 鈥� not just to protect the legal process, but to support the shift toward pricing models that are based on trust and outcomes.

What the legal industry needs from AI

To enable the transition to outcome-based pricing, the legal industry needs AI systems that do more than just answer questions. These tools should be able to plan, reason, and complete complex legal tasks. They must be easy to understand, explain their results, and fit naturally into legal workflows. Most importantly, they should always allow for human judgment.

These systems should be built with expert knowledge, trusted legal content, and strong ethical standards. Indeed, these AI-driven technologies aren鈥檛 just tools, rather they鈥檙e partners that help legal professionals do their work better.听In fact, moving from billable hours to outcome-based pricing is more than a change in billing 鈥� it鈥檚 a new way of thinking about legal work.

As AI continues to evolve, lawyers will spend more time on strategy and client relationships. And that鈥檚 good, because the future of legal work isn鈥檛 about doing more, it鈥檚 about doing better 鈥� and that future is already taking shape.

You can download a full copy of the 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 2025 State of the US Legal Market Report here

Jump to 鈫�

General Counsel Trends Driving Japan鈥檚 Legal Market in 2025

Nevertheless, there is a region where significant change is underfoot that could provide valuable lessons for law firms around the world, whether they are large global entities or boutique midsize firms 鈥� Japan.

The 成人VR视频 Institute鈥檚 latest report, , offers a rare and timely look into a legal market that is not only growing rapidly but also is evolving in ways that could foreshadow broader global trends. Based on in-depth interviews with general counsel and senior legal decision-makers at major Japanese corporations, the report reveals a market that is both uniquely Japanese and strikingly global in its trajectory.

A market on the move

Like in many legal markets around the world, Japan鈥檚 legal industry is undergoing a transformation. Once known for its conservative approach to legal services and a cultural preference for informal dispute resolution, the country is now seeing a surge in legal demand 鈥� particularly for international work. In fact, Japanese companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenue now allocate nearly half of their legal budgets to matters outside Japan.

This internationalization is not just a trend 鈥� it鈥檚 a structural shift. The number of Japanese companies with overseas legal needs has grown to 90% from 74% over the past decade. And with that growth comes opportunity, both for domestic firms to expand their capabilities and for international firms to gain a stronger foothold in a market that has traditionally been difficult to penetrate.

Yet, this growth is not without its challenges, as the report shows. Japan鈥檚 legal sector is grappling with a familiar but acute issue 鈥� a shortage of qualified legal professionals. As demand rises, firms are struggling to scale; and this has opened the door for international firms, particularly those with strong M&A and regulatory practices, to step in and support those Japanese clients with global ambitions.

The report also highlights how general counsel in Japan are increasingly prioritizing outside law firms with broad service offerings and global reach. While trust and relationships remain important, the ability to deliver across jurisdictions is becoming a key differentiator for many Japan-based law firms.

GenAI: A further catalyst for change

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of Japan鈥檚 legal evolution is its potential role as a proving ground for the use of generative AI (GenAI) in legal services. With its deep-rooted culture of technological innovation and a pressing need to boost capacity, Japan is uniquely positioned to lead in the adoption of AI-driven legal solutions and tools.

Japanese law firms are already embracing technologies like e-discovery and automation, and many see GenAI as a way to not only alleviate staffing pressures but also to leapfrog into a new era of legal service delivery. Whether this will help domestic firms reclaim market share from international competitors 鈥� or further accelerate the latter鈥檚 rise 鈥� remains to be seen.

What makes Japan鈥檚 legal market so compelling is not just its growth, but its potential to serve as a bellwether for the global industry. The interplay of internationalization, capacity constraints, and technological disruption is not unique to Japan 鈥� but the way these forces are converging there is.

As the report shows, for law firms around the world, understanding what鈥檚 happening in Japan isn鈥檛 just interesting 鈥� it鈥檚 instructive. The strategies that succeed (or fail) in this high-pressure, high-opportunity environment could offer a preview of what鈥檚 to come elsewhere.

You can explore

these insights in more detail by downloading a full copy of the 成人VR视频 Institute’s “General Counsel Trends Driving Japan鈥檚 Legal Market in 2025” or here

Jump to 鈫�

Midsize law firms at the start of 2025

Midsize law firms have experienced a prolonged period of growth, particularly in terms of demand for legal services. Year-end results from 2024 show that midsize firms are near the forefront of demand growth among all segments of law firms tracked by the 成人VR视频 Institute, a showing of strength in law firm key performance indicators (KPIs).

Another positive KPI is the continued growth of law firm productivity, which has continued to grow despite a 2.7% increase in headcount for the average midsize law firm over 2024. This is a notable achievement, given the nearly 15-year trend of declining productivity in the overall legal market.

Balancing rate growth and cost advantage

Midsize law firms are in the somewhat precarious position of needing to balance increasing their hourly rates to optimize revenue potential while simultaneously maintaining a cost advantage over larger peers. While midsize firms have been more aggressive in growing their rates compared to historical standards, it is notable that they have not pushed as hard as their competitors. While the more cautious approach has allowed them to maintain a cost advantage, it also means they might be missing opportunities for even stronger rate growth. As the report suggests, midsize firms should become more comfortable advocating for their higher billing rates. In fact, many midsize law firms have even gone so far as to implement tiered-rate structures to capture more value from new clients or new work from existing clients.

Further, the report shows that midsize law firms face challenges related to rising expenses. These increased expenditures, coupled with slower-than-market-average growth in rates, have somewhat offset the benefits of strong demand growth for many midsize law firms and placed a bit of a damper on their overall profitability. The average midsize firm has seen an increase in overhead expenses, with technology and knowledge management being key cost drivers. While these investments are crucial for long-term success, they have cut into profit growth. However, as the report emphasizes, these kinds of investments are also critical for firms that want to avoid falling behind larger firms that are leveraging advanced AI-driven tools to enhance their service offerings.

Indeed, innovation is a recurring theme in the report. Larger law firms have dedicated teams driving innovation in both internal processes and client-facing functions. Midsize firms, on the other hand, need to explore emerging technologies and find ways to incorporate them into their operations. Relying on outdated ways of working could put midsize firms at a disadvantage, especially as larger firms use technology to create more appealing and affordable service offerings.

Clearly, AI and technology are transforming the legal market, and midsize firms must keep pace with these changes. Corporate general counsel are increasingly looking to be early adopters of AI, and law firms that fail to recognize this shift can risk losing client favorability. Midsize firms should start by targeting low-hanging fruit and gradually adopting advanced AI tools to streamline workflows and enhance service delivery.

Conclusion: No time for complacency

Despite their recent successes, midsize law firms cannot afford to rest on their laurels. While they have enjoyed a period of demand strength and heightened productivity, the legal market is evolving rapidly. Larger competitors are moving aggressively towards an AI-driven future, and midsize firms must follow suit to remain competitive. Investing in technology, understanding client needs, and adopting innovative service models will be key to sustaining growth and profitability.

You can download

a full copy of the 成人VR视频 Institute “Midsize law firms at the start of 2025” by filling out the form below: